7 Resources Explaining The Learning Styles Myth

This is part 1 of a series of posts that provide resources for common learning myths or misunderstandings. I’m starting with learning styles because I hear this topic come up more than any of the other topics that are misunderstood.

The Myth of Learning Styles – detailed article from Cedar Riener and Daniel Willingham  about why learning styles are a myth.

Students may have preferences about how to learn, but no evidence suggests that catering to those preferences will lead to better learning.

Debunking the Myth – There Is No Such Thing As “Learning Styles” – Guy Wallace shares some thoughts and points us to an article from Sigmund Tobias.  Guy has many posts on this topic - learning styles.

Clark Quinn’s on his thoughts about learning styles:

do the best job for the content, and if that’s counter to a person’s learning style, help them learn to process or cope with different modalities – Clark Quinn

Evidence-Based Training: Debunking the Myth of Learning Styles -a short summary of Ruth Clark’s book where she addresses the myth of learning styles.

one of the biggest myths perpetuated by training professionals is accommodating different learning style

Learning styles: Worth our time? - Cathy Moore reviews research finding no clear evidence supporting any of the theories about learning styles.

The authors suggest that instead of adapting instruction to one of the gajillions of learning style theories, we should build learners’ metacognitive skills and use formative assessment

Learning Styles as Fortune Telling – Cammy Bean has a nice summary of her findings as she tries to better understand the role of learning styles in e-Learning.

Learning Styles Instructional-Design Challenge – Will Thalheimer has a yearly contest where he will give $1000 (US dollars) to the first person or group who can prove that taking learning styles into account in designing instruction can produce meaningful learning benefits.

What Do You Think?

  • Is it worth spending time catering to learning styles?
  • What other useful resources have you found for learning styles?
  • What learning myths do you hear most?

  • Will Thalheimer

    Hi. This is Will Thalheimer (of the $1,000 Learning Styles Challenge). One thing to keep in mind is that while “learning styles” might not be a good way to differentiate our learning methods for our learners, there is one proven “learning differentiator” that we should take into account. And that is—drum roll please—whether our learners are early in learning something or more advanced. Learners who are new to a topic almost always need a more basic approach helping them to gain a full understanding of the concepts involved. Learners who are more experienced can benefit from realistic retrieval practice, enabling them to remember the material over time. First we should aim for understanding, then we should aim for developing remembering. That’s a differentiator that works—and is supported by the learning research by the way.

  • http://www.learnstreaming.com Dennis Callahan

    Hi Will – this is a great point. I think we can sometimes over generalize a myth or misunderstanding that creeps into another area. Thanks for providing a research validated differentiator that is we should take into account.

  • Pingback: Daily link digest | Doug Woods

  • Eugene

    I tend to agree with Will, but want to expand on his notion a bit, because I see the early or advanced learning status is only one aspect.  It seems logical – though not yet validated by empirical studies – that the manner in which the student best receives and retains the information may be driven by the topic or task being taught. For example if the topic is complex, involves critical thinking, problem-solving or inductive reasoning, the presentation style to the learner may necessitate “chunking”, wherein the material is presented in a graduated manner with continual feedback. However, if the topic or task is relatively simple, primarily manual and requires mere rote memorization, the information may be communicated through hand-over-hand exercises or drills and rehearsals.
    Just my $.02 worth~E. Matthewswww.ledcome.com

  • Pingback: links for 2011-06-04 « Thagomizer.net Thagomizer.net

  • Pingback: Learning 2.0 06/22/2011 (p.m.) « Digital Learning 2.0